There are a couple different ways we can do a series of premium phones. Vivo has a spectrum of devices offered under the X200 label. I’ve spent a lot of time already using the X200 Pro to get work done for my videos and reviews.
The X200 arrives with the same powerhouse chip, but a few other “cost sensitive” component choices. Using it has been really interesting…
Curious how the X200 Pro performs BEFORE checking out the X200? Here’s my review of the X200 Pro!
Disclaimer
Vivo sent both the X200 and X200 Pro for me to review. No editorial influence from Vivo directly or associated PR has been offered or requested in writing this review.
Patreon and Support!
The folks on Patreon.com/SomeGadgetGuy got early access to this review, and were reading it two weeks early! These reviews would not be possible without the generosity of those awesome geeks! If you have the means, I would appreciate you checking out the community and becoming a member! If not, I can ALWAYS use more help spreading the word and sharing these articles!
Design
It’s the funny aspect of tooling up different phones. We’ve gotten used to a market where we often have different size options at different prices. The look and feel of the X200 is EXCEEDINGLY similar to the X200 Pro. There’s a tiny size difference, overall dimensions are about two millimeters shorter, which makes very little difference in daily use. If I’m not looking at the phones, I can’t easily tell them apart by feel.
One has to wonder if manufacturing costs could be minimized by using one consistent phone frame and swapping internals, rather than shipping such small differences. It is correct to say the X200 is a smaller phone, but it is not a small phone.
I am happy that the frame is so similar though.
We get a flat overall experience, from the side rails to the screen. Just slight tapers and edges, not unlike what Oppo is doing, for little design accents. It’s a really pretty aesthetic that is also easier to hold and use, especially when we focus on photography.
Display
Shrinking from a 6.78” screen to a 6.67” screen, we keep a lot of the same display specs. The same resolution means the X200 has a slightly higher PPI than the Pro, but at a resolution now that is likely only scientifically different for users.
Brightness is rated the same, and both Vivos list HDR10+, though only the Pro includes Dolby Vision. Both phones support 120Hz refresh, but again, only the Pro lists LTPO, to improve battery life when the screen is static. The X200 still lists Smart Switch in the display settings, and will dynamically adjust frame rate, but not to the same level as the Pro.
Similarly, for security, the X200 moves from the Pro’s Ultrasonic fingerprint sensor to an optical sensor. In operation, I like the Ultrasonic better, but it’s another area I doubt many people will truly feel differences unless they’re using both phones side by side. Optical sensors have improved dramatically over the last two years.
Components / Performance
I’m reviewing the 16GB of RAM version with 512GB of storage. Just like the Pro, we’re rocking the brutally powerful MediaTek Dimensity 9400. Between the X200 and X200 Pro, there’s no consistent measurable difference in performance that I can detect. I end up in margin-of-error territory between the top Vivos, and both are just a touch slower than the Oppo Find X8 Pro (which uses the same chip) in complex tasks.
That’s to say, you have a laptop powerful SOC in a phone which handily goes toe to toe with the Snapdragon 8 Elite, and often only loses in areas where the Dimensity might throttle sooner than the Snapdragon.
Even in Vivo’s more managed flavor, it’s an absolute monster of a chip, and nothing is really going to slow it down. From content creation to graphics intense gaming, you’ll chew through most tasks deliciously quick.
Would you like to see more data on the testing I perform? This article on my Patreon shows what the Vivo can really do in tasks like video editing, photo processing, and audio production! Your phone really IS a computer!
Where we will see a few differences, I’m disappointed that one “compromise” for cost on the X200 is video out through the USB-C port. There is no support for an external display or “AR” cinema glasses.
This one stings a bit. There’s so much compute potential here, that even without a desktop mode, we’d still want to DO more with this phone chip on larger screens. I know this has consistently been a dividing line for premium phones, but I wish that would change. It’s one area where this feels like a “flagship killer” instead of a proper option in the X200 lineup.
There aren’t many other areas where we feel compromises though.
Battery
Certainly not in battery or charging tech.
The X200 does have a slightly smaller battery than the Pro, but at 5,800 mAh, it’s still a significant increase over premium phones from 2024. It’s besting Pixel Pros and Galaxy Ultras. The Dimensity can draw a lot of power at full load, but it completes most daily-driver tasks so quickly, that people will use less battery in the long run.
Now that I’m using a OnePlus 13, I think it might be a bit easier to run a Snapdragon a little longer out in the field between charges, but the Dimensity is no slouch. Folks should be able to get over two days of run time with light or moderate use, without having to manage the device too strictly.
There’s practically no battery anxiety here as the X200 runs very well out in the field, AND it supports 90W fast charging, WITH that fast charger in the box. From completely empty, where the phone wont boot up, to a 100% charge took almost exactly 40 minutes on my first test. I don’t believe that’s how most people will use this. There’s no need to charge overnight, or let the battery fully discharge, when a 10-15 minute “top off” is all someone might need for daily use.
What’s missing though, the X200 does not have wireless charging, and I don’t miss it.
I love having magnetic accessories for my cases, but I genuinely don’t use wireless charging. I suppose people who already have fast wireless chargers might miss the feature, but it’s difficult to get too worked up about the omission when a 90W charger is included with the phone.
Radio and Reception
I’ve been very pleased with import phones on American networks. We lack complete band support for North America, but on T-Mobile’s network, I’m seeing respectable speeds and reception. I live out in the burbs, nearly in a rural area outside Los Angeles, and Mediatek’s radio is working well.
It’s a shame we still cant get full 5G support for our imports, but one could certainly use this as a daily driver in North America, if they don’t mind reduced data speeds.
Cameras
The biggest differences between the X200 and the Pro though will obviously be the cameras.
The Vivo X series is built on a photography and video reputation. The X200 is a very good all-rounder, but it does not bring the same bleeding edge performance we see from the Pro. It’s right on a border of performance, where it’s closer to a Vivo V40 Pro than it is to the X200 Pro.
The sensors are very similar to the V40 Pro, and even though we have the beastly Dimensity on tap, we’re lacking some of the more exotic features like 8K30 and 4K120 video.
Thankfully we keep excellent close focus on the telephoto sensor, making this a solid option for macro photos. For some reason, that’s still another dividing line between “normal” and “premium” phone cameras. The X200 is on the correct side of THIS line.
Vivo’s low light processing is still very good, but with this smaller sensor, night mode shots aren’t captured as quickly as on the “Pro” level phones. Beyond processing though, it’s not difficult demonstrating how much harder a smaller sensor needs to work in low light.
This is a very good collection of cameras, which should compete well against a Galaxy S25+ or iPhone 16 Plus, but it will struggle when facing more upscale competition from a Pixel Pro, Galaxy Ultra, or iPhone Pro.
It still has a “feel” of a premium camera experience, and the Zeiss badging is certainly not wasted on this gadget, but I definitely run into this phone’s limits sooner than the X200 Pro.
Software
A quick note on FunTouch, the skin is maturing beautifully.
It was a running joke in my review how FunTouch was the least “fun” skin on modern phones. The recent changes (alongside Android 15) have cleaned up some of the rough spots and added a little more character.
What remains, I still love the aesthetic that feels like a cross between Android 11 and current Material design.
Now, adding more options for navigation, docks and shortcuts, and a new multi-tasking gesture, FunTouch is becoming a more modern skin.
Better animations, pretty transitions, and better conveyance for advanced features is always appreciated.
I’m not going to harp on the AI stuff. It’s still lame that we don’t know what is happening on-device, and what needs a data connection, until a feature fails. I think it’s more fun to focus on the apps and services that are really using this fantastic Dimensity chip, and call it a day.
The Wrap Up
I really like this phone.
It’s difficult giving a phone like this a fair shot when I can pick up its bigger brother any time I want. It’s not really fair, but I’m less likely to reach for the X200 if I think I might need to capture a family memory. I love reviewing this stuff for you all, but I’m not going to sacrifice photo and video quality for important moments.
The X200 exists in an interesting state of balance.
In every review like this, I think it’s fair (maybe healthy) to ask “what do I want in an expensive phone”?
There’s a certain character in some tech enthusiasts, people who try to run every gadget they own to the limit. They like to tinker, and they like exploring. Unfortunately, the most satisfying experiences for those geeks is often only found at the upper Premium tier of pricing now.
I think we’re LONG past due bringing more “computing” features to the expensive phones which are not the MOST expensive phones in a company’s portfolio. Even entry level phones now should have quality of life features like external display support.
But I digress…
The X200 absolutely satisfies though as a premium companion/communication gadget. It’s a monster all-rounder with a ton of horsepower on tap. If the experiences you’re looking for are all going to be accomplished on the phone’s screen, there’s little in this price tier that can match it.